Call Us Today: +1 866 205 2414

When Execution Goes Sideways

Signs You Need Support

By Lowe Billingsley

No matter how well a project is planned, execution is where the real stress test begins. Under the pressure of timelines, contracts, field conditions, and scope complexity, even well-resourced capital projects can start to drift. Schedules slip. Scope expands. Costs rise. Communication slows. And the early warning signs—if they’re even recognized—often go unheeded until it’s too late to recover without significant cost and effort.

Knowing when to bring in execution support can mean the difference between regaining control and watching a project spiral. But few project teams are trained to recognize the inflection point. This article examines the most common—and often overlooked—signs that your project is deviating from its intended course, and that it’s time to consider embedded execution support to stabilize delivery.

The Myth of ‘Too Early’

Before diving into red flags, it’s worth addressing a common misconception: that execution support is only needed when a project is in crisis. In reality, the earlier support is introduced, the easier it is to prevent systemic issues from developing. Think of it as preventive medicine, not emergency surgery.

Unfortunately, many project teams wait too long, often due to pride, internal politics, or the misguided belief that recovery is just one decision away. But drift rarely corrects itself. It deepens, accelerates, and erodes confidence the longer it remains unaddressed.

Red Flag #1: Schedule Slip Without Recovery Planning

Missing a milestone isn’t uncommon. However, when missed tasks begin to accumulate without a clear, documented recovery strategy, execution starts to lose its structure.

Teams may attempt to re-sequence tasks or compress workfronts without adequate coordination. This leads to congestion, inefficiencies, and higher safety risks. If progress reports consistently show recurring slippage, but no formal mitigation plan is in place—or worse, if reporting begins to soften reality to avoid executive concern—that’s a clear indicator that execution support is needed.

An embedded support advisor can help teams not only diagnose slippage but also implement targeted, achievable recovery strategies that preserve critical path continuity and prevent panic-driven decision-making.

Red Flag #2: Growing Reliance on Informal Change

In the early stages of a project, a few undocumented scope adjustments might seem harmless—until they multiply. Minor changes to work packages, site instructions, or contractor deliverables that bypass formal review quickly lead to disjointed planning, budget blowouts, and a breakdown in accountability.

If teams are responding to issues “on the fly,” issuing direction in meetings or emails rather than following change control processes, the project is slipping into reactive mode. Execution support restores discipline to the process by enforcing rigorous change control, validating impacts, and helping project leaders reestablish structured governance in fast-moving environments.

Red Flag #3: Contractor Friction and Communication Breakdown

It’s common for tensions to arise between owners and contractors during the execution phase. However, when friction begins to impact productivity, communication, or decision-making velocity, the damage can escalate rapidly.

Signs include:

  • Excessive RFIs or repeated clarification requests
  • Scope disputes or divergent interpretations of contract terms
  • Delays in critical issue resolution due to mistrust or poor coordination
  • Breakdown in site-level versus leadership-level communication

These issues don’t just slow the project—they degrade morale, increase claims risk, and create silos that prevent project-wide alignment. Embedded support specialists can serve as neutral facilitators, rebuild communication pathways, and reestablish a unified reporting cadence across all execution tiers.

Red Flag #4: Leadership Is Flying Blind

When senior leaders begin to receive inconsistent reports, outdated dashboards, or ambiguous cost updates, it signals that real-time visibility has eroded.

If project controls struggle to keep up with change, or if performance data lags days or weeks behind field reality, leadership loses its ability to intervene early. Financial surprises emerge late. Decisions are made with partial information. Trust in the project team declines.

Execution support teams don’t just enhance field operations—they also help improve reporting discipline, streamline performance metrics, and ensure leadership has the clarity it needs to guide the project forward.

Red Flag #5: Risk Register Hasn’t Been Touched in Weeks

If your risk register is collecting dust, you’re not managing risk—you’re just hoping it doesn’t materialize. A stagnant or outdated risk register is one of the clearest indicators that execution discipline has fallen behind.

In volatile conditions, risks evolve rapidly. If risk mitigation actions aren’t being tracked, assigned, and followed up with urgency, then execution is proceeding without a safety net.

Execution support advisors reactivate risk monitoring, update exposure rankings, and help translate risks into decisions about contingency allocation, resource allocation, and schedule buffering—before problems crystallize.

Red Flag #6: Decision-Making Has Slowed or Bottlenecked

Projects thrive when decisions are made quickly and confidently. When they aren’t, drift begins to set in.

Symptoms include:

  • Delayed approvals for field changes or procurement adjustments
  • Repeated escalations due to unclear authority or unclear process
  • Increased “informal” decision-making at the field level to avoid bottlenecks

Execution support introduces clarity. By helping document roles, escalate decisions appropriately, and track outcomes, support advisors maintain the flow of execution, without bypassing accountability or creating confusion.

Red Flag #7: Morale and Accountability Are Deteriorating

Project performance isn’t only technical. It’s cultural. When teams begin to disengage—when meetings feel redundant, when people stop volunteering risks, when “it’s not my job” becomes common—that’s a sign of drift just as much as a missed milestone.

Execution support can restore structure, clarify expectations, and realign team cohesion through embedded field presence and active engagement with key personnel across the execution structure.

It’s Not About Taking Over—It’s About Restoring Control

Some leaders hesitate to bring in external support because they fear it sends the wrong message—that the team is failing, or that they’re losing control.

In reality, bringing in execution support is a sign of maturity. It means the project owner recognizes the need to protect outcomes, reduce uncertainty, and reinforce what’s already working. Support teams don’t displace internal leadership—they augment it, ensuring momentum is maintained and costly deviations are avoided.

TMG Helps You Recognize—& Respond to—Project Drift

At TMG, we embed with your teams to help reinforce structure, restore alignment, and sustain execution discipline. Whether your project is showing early warning signs or is already slipping, our advisors work on-site and in real-time to prevent further degradation and help you regain control.

We don’t take over. We help you stabilize, recover, and deliver with confidence. 

Is your project trying to course-correct in the dark?

Contact a TMG expert today to talk through the early warning signs and how embedded execution support can help restore momentum before problems escalate.

Contact Form
Download the latest Business Guide: The Reality of Energy Transition: Why Oil & Gas Still Matter to gain deeper insights into securing energy for the future.
Business Guide - The Reality of Energy Transition